Oil Giant Citgo Criminally Convicted in Bird Deaths (remind you of something?)

Here's a rule of thumb: if something is so toxic that birds die when they land on it, it's probably a good idea to put a cover on it.

In Texas yesterday, a federal district court upheld a criminal conviction against the oil refinery giant Citgo Petroleum after migratory birds landed in two open-top refinery tanks and died. Under Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rules and Texas law such tanks are supposed to be covered. The court found that the company had known birds were landing and dying in their tanks but failed to do anything about it.

Citgo faces some $2 million in fines. A too small price to pay I think for their negligent behavior.

In Canada's tar sands, similar cases of migratory bird deaths have been ruled very differently. Many will remember the story in 2008 when 1600 ducks landed on the massive lakes of tar sands toxic by-products and died.

Here's a news report at the time of the deaths:

Syncrude, the tar sands giant responsible for the deaths, was ordered to pay $3m in fines.

But the deaths continued again in 2010 when more than 500 ducks caught in a winter storm sought refuge on what they thought were fresh water ponds. Those “ponds” turned out to be toxic lakes of sludge courtesy of Syncrude and Suncor. The ducks, covered in oily sludge, had to be put down. 

In early October this year the Alberta government announced there will be no charges laid against Syncrude or Suncor because it was the winter storm that caused the ducks to land and there was nothing the companies could have done to prevent the deaths.

Unlike Citgo, whose relatively small oil refinery tanks can easily be covered with nets, the toxic lakes in Northern Alberta that store all of the sludgy byproducts of tar sands operations are so large they can be seen from space and thus impossible to cover and protect from birds.

So this tragedy has no end. As tar sands production increases, the size of these toxic lakes will increase and the birds that have flown this same migratory path for millions of years will continue to die.


Everyone should pay attention to Syncrude's legal defence.  They claimed that there is no way to prevent the the birds from landing on the ponds, so… why bother.

Yup, they have stated there is no way to prevent the birds from dieing on their ponds.

I really appreciate the facts and details you are conveying. I also appreciate the difficulty in trying to convey the enourmous footprint of the oil extraction underway in Northern Alberta.

I do not, however, think much good comes from asserting that operations are “so large they can be seen from space”. The amibugity of this is renders the statement unimpressive to a reader with a scientific background. Are you claiming it is visible using the naked eye from low earth orbit? Or claiming it can spotted using google earth? The former would be astounding but still not really help convey the size in a tangible way. The latter would convey nothing at all. More probably you mean something between the two - but it is a huge range!

In any case, I take your point that they are big enough to have a horrendous effect on all sorts of wildlife and Suncor/Syncrude are being douchebags about it.

It is embarrasing that as a well developed country Canada is still allwoing such environmental damage to take place. The Canadian environmental law needs to be held accountable. The Alberta tar sands and all of their side effects such as these tailing ponds should not be allowed to happen in Canada. Are we allowing such environmental degredation to take place because it is so profitable or because it is so far north that it is 'out of sight, out of mind' or the average Canadian? There needs to be more education and relization from the Canadian people about just how horrific this project is. I am embarrased as a Canadian that we spend our time boasting of our great country, being proud when we travel abroad, looking down on other countrie because they do not have free health care, yet in our own back yard we willing let an area greater than the size of florida be destroyed.