Global Warming Deniers Grow More Desperate By The Day

Heartland Unabomber Billboard

This is a guest post by David Suzuki.

The Heartland Institute’s recent International Climate Change Conference in Las Vegas illustrates global warming deniers’ desperate confusion. As Bloomberg News noted, “Heartland’s strategy seemed to be to throw many theories at the wall and see what stuck.” A who’s who of fossil fuel industry supporters and anti-science shills variously argued that global warming is a myth; that it’s happening but natural — a result of the sun or “Pacific Decadal Oscillation”; that it’s happening but we shouldn’t worry about it; or that global cooling is the real problem.

The only common thread, Bloomberg reported, was the preponderance of attacks on and jokes about Al Gore: “It rarely took more than a minute or two before one punctuated the swirl of opaque and occasionally conflicting scientific theories.”

Personal attacks are common among global warming deniers. Their lies are continually debunked, leaving them with no rational challenge to overwhelming scientific evidence that the world is warming and that humans are largely responsible. Comments under my columns about global warming include endless repetition of falsehoods like “there’s been no warming for 18 years”, “it’s the sun”, and references to “communist misanthropes”, “libtard warmers”, alarmists and worse…

Far worse. Katharine Hayhoe, director of Texas Tech’s Climate Science Center and an evangelical Christian, had her email inbox flooded with hate mail and threats after conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh denounced her, and right-wing blogger Mark Morano published her email address. “I got an email the other day so obscene I had to file a police report,” Hayhoe said in an interview on the Responding to Climate Change website. “They mentioned my child. It had all kinds of sexual perversions in it — it just makes your skin crawl.”

One email chastised her for taking “a man’s job” and called for her public execution, finishing with, “If you have a child, then women in the future will be even more leery of lying to get ahead, when they see your baby crying next to the basket next to the guillotine.”

Many attacks came from fellow Christians unable to accept that humans can affect “God’s creation”. That’s a belief held even by a few well-known scientists and others held up as climate experts, including Roy Spencer, David Legates and Canadian economist Ross McKitrick. They’ve signed the Cornwall Alliance's Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming, which says, “We believe Earth and its ecosystems — created by God's intelligent design and infinite power and sustained by His faithful providence — are robust, resilient, self-regulating, and self-correcting, admirably suited for human flourishing, and displaying His glory. Earth's climate system is no exception.” This worldview predetermines their approach to the science.

Lest you think nasty, irrational comments are exclusively from fringe elements, remember the gathering place for most deniers, the Heartland Institute, has compared those who accept the evidence for human-caused climate change to terrorists. Similar language was used to describe the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in a full-page ad in USA Today and Politico from the Environmental Policy Alliance, a front group set up by PR firm Berman and Company, which has attacked environmentalists, labour-rights advocates, health organizations — even Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the Humane Society — on behalf of funders and clients including Monsanto, Wendy’s and tobacco giant Phillip Morris. The terrorism meme was later picked up by Pennsylvania Republican congressman Mike Kelly.

Fortunately, most people don’t buy irrational attempts to disavow science. A Forum Research poll found 81 per cent of Canadians accept the reality of global warming, and 58 per cent agree it’s mostly human-caused. An Ipsos MORI poll found that, although the U.S. has a higher number of climate change deniers than 20 countries surveyed, 54 per cent of Americans believe in human-caused climate change. (Research also shows climate change denial is most prevalent in English-speaking countries, especially in areas “served” by media outlets owned by Rupert Murdoch, who rejects climate science.)

It’s time to shift attention from those who sow doubt and confusion, either out of ignorance or misanthropic greed, to those who want to address a real, serious problem. The BBC has the right idea, instructing its reporters to improve accuracy by giving less air time to people with anti-science views, including climate change deniers.

Solutions exist, but every delay makes them more difficult and costly.

Written with Contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Senior Editor Ian Hanington.

Learn more at



i tend to agree, but lately efforts appear desperate.  I've also noticed science hate sites like Watts Up With That have incredibly low viewing stats.

In fact I consider you showing up here again as a sign of this desperation.

When you have a gathering of 20-people in one room, each spouting a different, contradictory and irreconcilable reality, you can be in just one of two places - a Heritage Institute climate change conference or a lunatic asylum.  Or perhaps that's just one place.

It's funny that you should mention the multiple 'spouting' of supposed realities. That is exactly what is killing the CAGW mantra. Why do you think there have so many (expensive) studies on the subject of “Communicating Climate Change”?

There have been WAY too many groups making claims over the past 30 years that can't possibly come true. In fact many have already been proven false by your own IPCC (95% of models projecting temp increases that are way too high).

But everyone is battling for their slice of the Global Warming pie ($$$), the billions spent in the last 20 years alone is amazing for an hypothesis that is failing every test. It's “grab some $$ while you can before the gravy train derails”.


She refuses at all opportunities to produce evidence and has said that she does not require evidence for her beliefs.  Over time this is pretty much the only thing she's said that has remained constant.

Here's all the temperature graphs including Koch Coal paid for and Anthony Watts vetted BEST;

Maybe they are getting desperate because its turning out to be a hot year, and the usual excuss will sound mighty weak in the brain department.  “Last year was a freak year.”  “Temperatures having been going up since 2014.”

I think that the main distinction is that, while scientists and others that support the view that the climate is changing (the vast majority) see it as a scientific theory supported by overwhelming evidence, those that deny climate change believe the climate is not changing. So they will only believe the information that supports their beliefs. The other part of it is that those that benefit nicely from activities causing climate change understand this belief handicap. And certain segments of society that are at the low end of the rational thinking spectrum are particularly susceptible to the belief handicap. So that seems to be a primary focus of the disruption and disinformation campaigns. I'm suprised to see hired PR guns and trolls on this site trying to stir things up, but I would guess their goal is to come on here and disrupt meaningful and rational discussion.