As Trump Takes Office, Women Scientists and Environmental Activists Fight Back Against Climate Change Deniers in D.C.

Julie-Dermansky-022
on

The day after Trump’s inauguration, dozens of female scientists decked out in white lab coats met in front of the National Air and Space Museum for the Women’s March in Washington, D.C. They were carrying colorful signs showing support for science. 

They are part of 500 Women Scientists, a group that debuted the day after the election to fight anti-science and anti-women rhetoric. Since then, over 12,000 women scientists from around the world have signed on to the group’s open letter

That pledge warns that “our work as scientists and our values as human beings are under attack. We fear that the scientific progress and momentum in tackling our biggest challenges, including staving off the worst impacts of climate change, will be severely hindered under this next U.S. administration. Our planet cannot afford to lose any time.”

Wendy Bohon holds a pro-science sign at the Women's March on Washington.
Wendy Bohon, one of the founders of the group 500 Women Scientists, proudly displays her pro-science sign with others at the Women’s March on Washington.

At the march, Wendy Bohon, a seismologist who works in D.C. and one of the group’s founders, carried a sign that said, “What Do We Want? Evidence-based Claims. When Do We Want It? After Peer Review, ” followed by “Science Is Not a Liberal Conspiracy.” Her message is right in line with the group’s mission: to promote evidence-based decision making in science and in politics. 

Group of mostly women scientists posing together with their pro-science signs before the march.
Supporters affiliated with the group 500 Women Scientists pose with their signs in front of the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C.

I asked some of the scientists how they felt about the subject of climate change being removed from the White House website as soon as Trump was sworn in as president. 

Planetary scientist Lindy Elkins-Tanton said that while she worries about such things, she was going to wait and see. “I have a great belief that forces for inclusion and positiveness will carry the day, so I’m trying not to make hasty, depressing decisions.”

Scientist Christy Till in a lab coat at the Women's March.
Christy Till, one of the founders of the group 500 Women Scientists, which marched together in support of science at the Women’s March on Washington.

My heart sunk,” said Christy Till, an Arizona State University professor of earth and planetary science. Till and the others had worried that Trump’s administration would backtrack on climate science, and news of its removal from the White House website spread fast. “It was a fear that you have coming to reality.”

But Till doesn’t see everything as being completely bleak. “There are a lot of people who work in government who are on our side, and all of that institutional knowledge is a buffer to change, ” she said. “They are not going to roll over.”

They can’t fire everyone in every department all at once,” she insisted. “You have to have credentials. You have to have experience.” 

Climate scientist Dominique Bacheler holds a sign that says "Women discover."
Climate scientist Dominique Bacheler in front of the Air and Space Museum ahead of the January 21, 2017 Women’s March in D.C.

However, Dominique Bacheler, an Oregon State University scientist who studies the impact of climate change, wasn’t as optimistic. When she found out climate change had been erased from the White House website, she screamed. “It is absolutely unreal,’” she said. “It is one of the things everyone in the whole world is going to have to deal with.” 

Protesters hold signs disavowing Trump's EPA chief pick, Scott Pruitt.
Protesters express disapproval of Trump’s EPA chief pick, Scott Pruitt, at the entrance to the Washington Monument where people without tickets could watch Trump’s inauguration on a large teleprompter screen. 

Protesters hold signs supporting climate science at Trump's inauguration
Protesters hold signs in support of climate science, among other causes, where people exiting Trump’s inauguration came out.

On Trump’s inauguration day, signs expressing concern about the environment were carried at protests around the city staged by DisruptJ20, a coalition of activist groups, as well as at the Women’s March the following day. Their messages ranged from protecting the EPA to dumping Trump’s science-denying cabinet picks. 

A protester holds a sign reading 'Facts matter.'
Signs at the Women’s March on Washington carried messages reinforcing the importance of facts, data, and science to society.

The day after the march, Trump’s senior adviser Kellyanne Conway defended press secretary Sean Spicer, who lied about the crowd size at the inauguration; he was merely offering up “alternative facts,” she said. On the same day, 500 Women Scientists published an open letter to President Trump that stressed the importance of facts. 

We either thrive together or we fail together. American innovation and advancement over the next four years depends on your support,” the letter states, but since science relies on facts, the tentative hope many of the women scientists expressed at the march may be short lived.

A male supporter at the Women's March holds a sign showing the 'development of man' and its devolvement.
A man at the Women’s March on Washington holds a sign indicating backward progress in attitudes toward science and other issues. 

A woman marcher holds a sign reading 'Mother Earth deserves better.'
One of many signs showing support for the environment and science which were carried by people who participated in the Women’s March on Washington.

An aerospace engineer holds his pro-science, anti-Trump protest sign in front of the White House
Kristopher Holgerson, an aerospace engineer based in Danbury, Connecticut, in front of the White House after the Women’s March on Washington.

Women scientists hold a 'We heart data' sign ahead of the Women's March.
Women scientists show an appreciation for data as they gather before the Women’s March in D.C. the day after Trump’s inauguration.

Marchers hold signs on the National Mall, including one calling for regulating carbon dioxide
Participants in the Women’s March on Washington congregate with their signs on the National Mall before the march began.

Mural in support of Standing Rock painted and taped to a temporary wood wall
A mural supporting Standing Rock and the fight against the Dakota Access pipeline was created on temporary walls put up in D.C.’s McPherson Square Park. 

Director Josh Fox holds his camera above his head to shoot the actions of protesters
Gasland director Josh Fox filming an impromptu DisruptJ20 march, which was a movement meant to stymie Trump’s swearing in and related activities, on Inauguration Day.

Protesters hold signs against racism, sexism, homophobia, and more.
Participants in a movement called DisruptJ20 take to the streets the night of Trump’s inauguration in an attempt to shut down activities related to it.

A Standing Rock supporter holds a megaphone next to riot police
An advocate for clean water who was at Standing Rock, known as a “water protector,” talks to riot police after they had dispersed a crowd that was gathered around a fire.

Protesters urge the Senate to reject science-denying Cabinet nominees
Participants in the DisruptJ20 movement, aimed at shutting down the inauguration and related activities, express their disapproval of several Trump Cabinet picks at the Washington Monument.

A woman holds an anti-fracking sign at the Women's March.
Signs at the Women’s March on Washington also displayed anti-fracking, pro-climate action messages.

Two children play with signs left after the Women's March
Young Ben and Cora Ebinger from Minneapolis, Minnesota, play with signs left across from the White House after the Women’s March on Washington.

Main image: One woman’s sign calls to “Save the EPA” during a rally before the Women’s March on Washington the day after Trump’s inauguration.

Julie-Dermansky-022
Julie Dermansky is a multimedia reporter and artist based in New Orleans. She is an affiliate scholar at Rutgers University’s Center for the Study of Genocide and Human Rights. Visit her website at www.jsdart.com.

Related Posts

on

The deal would place 40 percent of California’s idle wells in the hands of one operator. Campaigners warn this poses an "immense" risk to the state — which new rules could help to mitigate, depending on how regulators act.

The deal would place 40 percent of California’s idle wells in the hands of one operator. Campaigners warn this poses an "immense" risk to the state — which new rules could help to mitigate, depending on how regulators act.
Opinion
on

Corporations are using sport to sell the high-carbon products that are killing our winters, and now we can put a figure on the damage their money does.

Corporations are using sport to sell the high-carbon products that are killing our winters, and now we can put a figure on the damage their money does.
on

Inside the conspiracy to take down wind and solar power.

Inside the conspiracy to take down wind and solar power.
on

A new report estimates the public cost of underwriting U.S. plastics industry growth and the environmental violations that followed.

A new report estimates the public cost of underwriting U.S. plastics industry growth and the environmental violations that followed.