Denying Climate Change; Urging Inaction

Read time: 9 mins

This is the text of a letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper from 60 “accredited experts” who deny the reality of climate change. See the next post for additional information on the reliability of this group:

Open Kyoto to debateSixty scientists call on Harper to revisit the science of global warming

Special to the Financial Post
Thursday, April 06, 2006
An open letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper:Dear Prime Minister:As accredited experts in climate and related scientific disciplines, we are writing to propose that balanced, comprehensive public-consultation sessions be held so as to examine the scientific foundation of the federal government's climate-change plans. This would be entirely consistent with your recent commitment to conduct a review of the Kyoto Protocol. Although many of us made the same suggestion to then-prime ministers Martin and Chretien, neither responded, and, to date, no formal, independent climate-science review has been conducted in Canada. Much of the billions of dollars earmarked for implementation of the protocol in Canada will be squandered without a proper assessment of recent developments in climate science.Observational evidence does not support today's computer climate models, so there is little reason to trust model predictions of the future. Yet this is precisely what the United Nations did in creating and promoting Kyoto and still does in the alarmist forecasts on which Canada's climate policies are based. Even if the climate models were realistic, the environmental impact of Canada delaying implementation of Kyoto or other greenhouse-gas reduction schemes, pending completion of consultations, would be insignificant. Directing your government to convene balanced, open hearings as soon as possible would be a most prudent and responsible course of action.While the confident pronouncements of scientifically unqualified environmental groups may provide for sensational headlines, they are no basis for mature policy formulation. The study of global climate change is, as you have said, an “emerging science,” one that is perhaps the most complex ever tackled. It may be many years yet before we properly understand the Earth's climate system. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made since the protocol was created, many of which are taking us away from a concern about increasing greenhouse gases. If, back in the mid-1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.We appreciate the difficulty any government has formulating sensible science-based policy when the loudest voices always seem to be pushing in the opposite direction. However, by convening open, unbiased consultations, Canadians will be permitted to hear from experts on both sides of the debate in the climate-science community. When the public comes to understand that there is no “consensus” among climate scientists about the relative importance of the various causes of global climate change, the government will be in a far better position to develop plans that reflect reality and so benefit both the environment and the economy.“Climate change is real” is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified. Global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural “noise.” The new Canadian government's commitment to reducing air, land and water pollution is commendable, but allocating funds to “stopping climate change” would be irrational. We need to continue intensive research into the real causes of climate change and help our most vulnerable citizens adapt to whatever nature throws at us next.We believe the Canadian public and government decision-makers need and deserve to hear the whole story concerning this very complex issue. It was only 30 years ago that many of today's global-warming alarmists were telling us that the world was in the midst of a global-cooling catastrophe. But the science continued to evolve, and still does, even though so many choose to ignore it when it does not fit with predetermined political agendas.We hope that you will examine our proposal carefully and we stand willing and able to furnish you with more information on this crucially important topic.CC: The Honourable Rona Ambrose, Minister of the Environment, and the Honourable Gary Lunn, Minister of Natural Resources- - -Sincerely,Dr. Ian D. Clark, professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of OttawaDr. Tad Murty, former senior research scientist, Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans, former director of Australia's National Tidal Facility and professor of earth sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide; currently adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of OttawaDr. R. Timothy Patterson, professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University, OttawaDr. Fred Michel, director, Institute of Environmental Science and associate professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, OttawaDr. Madhav Khandekar, former research scientist, Environment Canada. Member of editorial board of Climate Research and Natural HazardsDr. Paul Copper, FRSC, professor emeritus, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ont.Dr. Ross McKitrick, associate professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph, Ont.Dr. Tim Ball, former professor of climatology, University of Winnipeg; environmental consultantDr. Andreas Prokocon, adjunct professor of earth sciences, University of Ottawa; consultant in statistics and geologyMr. David Nowell, M.Sc. (Meteorology), fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, Canadian member and past chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, OttawaDr. Christopher Essex, professor of applied mathematics and associate director of the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.Dr. Gordon E. Swaters, professor of applied mathematics, Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, and member, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Research Group, University of AlbertaDr. L. Graham Smith, associate professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.Dr. G. Cornelis van Kooten, professor and Canada Research Chair in environmental studies and climate change, Dept. of Economics, University of VictoriaDr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Dept. of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, HalifaxDr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, climate consultant, former meteorology advisor to the World Meteorological Organization. Previously research scientist in climatology at University of Exeter, U.K.Dr. Keith D. Hage, climate consultant and professor emeritus of Meteorology, University of AlbertaDr. David E. Wojick, P.Eng., energy consultant, Star Tannery, Va., and Sioux Lookout, Ont.Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, B.C.Dr. Douglas Leahey, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, CalgaryPaavo Siitam, M.Sc., agronomist, chemist, Cobourg, Ont.Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, The University of Auckland, N.Z.Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDr. Freeman J. Dyson, emeritus professor of physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, N.J.Mr. George Taylor, Dept. of Meteorology, Oregon State University; Oregon State climatologist; past president, American Association of State ClimatologistsDr. Ian Plimer, professor of geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide; emeritus professor of earth sciences, University of Melbourne, AustraliaDr. R.M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, AustraliaMr. William Kininmonth, Australasian Climate Research, former Head National Climate Centre, Australian Bureau of Meteorology; former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology, Scientific and Technical ReviewDr. Hendrik Tennekes, former director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological InstituteDr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen, geologist/paleoclimatologist, Climate Change Consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New ZealandDr. Patrick J. Michaels, professor of environmental sciences, University of VirginiaDr. Nils-Axel Morner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics & geodynamics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SwedenDr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, Calif.Dr. Roy W. Spencer, principal research scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, HuntsvilleDr. Al Pekarek, associate professor of geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Dept., St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minn.Dr. Marcel Leroux, professor emeritus of climatology, University of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS[empty-para]Dr. Paul Reiter, professor, Institut Pasteur, Unit of Insects and Infectious Diseases, Paris, France. Expert reviewer, IPCC Working group II, chapter 8 (human health)Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, physicist and chairman, Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, PolandDr. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, reader, Dept. of Geography, University of Hull, U.K.; editor, Energy & EnvironmentDr. Hans H.J. Labohm, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations) and an economist who has focused on climate changeDr. Lee C. Gerhard, senior scientist emeritus, University of Kansas, past director and state geologist, Kansas Geological SurveyDr. Asmunn Moene, past head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, NorwayDr. August H. Auer, past professor of atmospheric science, University of Wyoming; previously chief meteorologist, Meteorological Service (MetService) of New ZealandDr. Vincent Gray, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001,' Wellington, N.Z.Dr. Howard Hayden, emeritus professor of physics, University of ConnecticutDr Benny Peiser, professor of social anthropology, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, U.K.Dr. Jack Barrett, chemist and spectroscopist, formerly with Imperial College London, U.K.Dr. William J.R. Alexander, professor emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Member, United Nations Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000Dr. S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences, University of Virginia; former director, U.S. Weather Satellite ServiceDr. Harry N.A. Priem, emeritus professor of planetary geology and isotope geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for Isotope Geosciences; past president of the Royal Netherlands Geological & Mining SocietyDr. Robert H. Essenhigh, E.G. Bailey professor of energy conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State UniversityDr. Sallie Baliunas, astrophysicist and climate researcher, Boston, Mass.Douglas Hoyt, senior scientist at Raytheon (retired) and co-author of the book The Role of the Sun in Climate Change; previously with NCAR, NOAA, and the World Radiation Center, Davos, SwitzerlandDipl.-Ing. Peter Dietze, independent energy advisor and scientific climate and carbon modeller, official IPCC reviewer, Bavaria, GermanyDr. Boris Winterhalter, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, FinlandDr. Wibjorn Karlen, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, SwedenDr. Hugh W. Ellsaesser, physicist/meteorologist, previously with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Calif.; atmospheric consultant.Dr. Art Robinson, founder, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, Cave Junction, Ore.Dr. Arthur Rorsch, emeritus professor of molecular genetics, Leiden University, The Netherlands; past board member, Netherlands organization for applied research (TNO) in environmental, food and public healthDr. Alister McFarquhar, Downing College, Cambridge, U.K.; international economistDr. Richard S. Courtney, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K.© National Post 2006

For more on the who's who of the global warming denial industry, check out our comprehensive climate deniers research database.

Get DeSmog News and Alerts


I notice that, one year later, the “upcoming response” to this letter has not appeared. I wonder why that is?

That’s a good observation. At least, it would be if it were correct.

The response to this letter is an examination if the credentials of the ‘leading’ scientists that wrote this letter containing “unbiased science.” Unbiased–what a laugh.

If you visit you will see the response. The drop down box lists the signatories that have been investigated.

Read it and then say again that this is a rational letter written by unbiased scientists.

I visited the referenced website. Found no response to the letter. Found descriptions of scientists who had published thousands of research results in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

I googled “Darryl Ring”. The only hit I found was for some program administrator selling what appears to be a set of text editing aids. Probably not the same person because s/he suggested “Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others” which is about as far away as one could get from this thread.

This guy didn’t sign that awful letter asking the Government of Canada to keep an open mind but he’s obviously a DENIER and therefore a candidate for a Desmog investigation: Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University. Here’s his heresy: “I’ve never been paid a nickel by an oil company. And I’m not a Republican. But in the past 15,000 years there have been climate shifts “20 times greater than the warming in the past century.” Sic ‘im, Richard!

Your comment makes this thing a political issue again. Wether or not Don J. Easterbrook is a Republican is totally irrelevant. Paid by energy dollars? And? You think David Suzuki lives of the proceeds of his own vegetable garden? I am by heart and nature a liberal, but still completely disagree with the Global Warmers such as Al Gore and his supporters in Hollywood. For once I support a (as you want to call it) a Rebulican cause for the simple reason that it makes way too much sense that CO2 is not responsible for Global Warming. New York and London won’t disappear beneath the waves. If they really think that, have they already started drawings for the biggest levee system in the history of mankind meanwhile? Love it also when Kathrina is blamed on Global Warming. The disaster was as big as it was as the US authorities failed for years to strengthen the levees, this fact was very well reported years ago in a documentary on the Discovery Channel.

They are tagged as deniers of the reality of climate change but the letter clearly states that they don’t deny that climate change occurs so they aren’t deniers.