NRSP: Climate Change Deniers-Are-Us

authordefault
on

Congratulations to Tom Harris, executive director of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (better known as Not Really Science People), who has scoured the earth for “experts” prepared to deny the science behind climate change and has found a couple of people we’d never heard of before.

Most (27) of Harris’s 31 “experts” fall nicely into the category of “usual suspects,” having all signed the infamous Letter of 60, demanding that the Canadian government take NO action on climate change. (Kudos to Harris for his success on that front, as well.)

But there are four names here that weren’t on that letter. Dr. David Legates (University of Delaware), Dr. Garth Paltride (University of Tasmania, Emeritus), Hans Erren (a “geophysical consultant” from the Netherlands) and Dr. Robert Balling.

Balling has been around for a while, taking money from energy companies (Exxon, etc.) and denying climate change; he must have been out of town when they created the Letter of 60.

And Legates also pops up on the Sourcewatch list of industry-friendly experts. But Erren and Paltridge are new.

Well done Tom. If you can find another living, breathing, climate-change denying “expert” anywhere else on the planet, let us know. We’ll publicize his name and website right here on the DeSmogBlog.

Related Posts

on

Federal tax data reveals the Canadian journalist spent 10 years at the Aurea Foundation, a top funder of think tanks that argue the climate crisis isn’t real.

Federal tax data reveals the Canadian journalist spent 10 years at the Aurea Foundation, a top funder of think tanks that argue the climate crisis isn’t real.
on

The views expressed on the channel had “absolutely no basis in fact”, experts have said.

The views expressed on the channel had “absolutely no basis in fact”, experts have said.
Analysis
on

Alberta produces 70 percent more petroleum, but has only one percent of the savings. Equalization payments have nothing to do with it.

Alberta produces 70 percent more petroleum, but has only one percent of the savings. Equalization payments have nothing to do with it.
on

Repeal accompanies a new report that confirms existing carbon capture projects continue to underperform.

Repeal accompanies a new report that confirms existing carbon capture projects continue to underperform.