Monster List: Skeptics Have Touted "Global Cooling" Theory Anywhere They Could

Read time: 14 mins

As word spreads about the Associated Press blind test examining the global cooling theory, which I wrote about earlier this week, I began to wonder how many times skeptics have tried to push this global cooling myth recently on the Internets.

So I perused the first 10 pages of results on Google for the term “global cooling” and discovered plenty of examples of skeptics hawking their global cooling theory on the usual suspect blogs and media outlets (with a few exceptions like the much-ballyhooed BBC News article earlier this month). Here is a sampling of the results of the search:

[Editor’s note: this is just the beginning of the monster list. Our research team is adding a ton more over the next couple of hours]

Investor’s Business Daily | October 12, 2009
Title: “Three Decades Of Global Cooling”
“Earth’s climate is influenced by many things, the least of which is the internal combustion engine. We and reputable scientists have noted the earth has cooled during the last decade, a period in which the sun has grown very quiet with little or no sunspot activity.”

BBC News | October 9, 2009
Article title: What happened to global warming?
“This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998. But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.”

Christian Science Monitor | October 10, 2009
“The Earth isn’t warming right now, is why. It may even be cooling down somewhat. Five major climate centers around the world agree that average global temperatures have not risen in the past 11 years, according to the BBC. In fact, in eight of those years, global average temperatures dipped a tad.”

NewsBusters | September 20, 2009
“the Atlantic, and particularly the North Atlantic, has been cooling instead. And it looks set to continue a cooling phase for 10 to 20 more years.  … it is increasingly clear that global warming is on hiatus for the time being. And that is not what the UN, the alarmist scientists or environmentalists predicted. For the past dozen years, since the Kyoto accords were signed in 1997, it has been beaten into our heads with the force and repetition of the rowing drum on a slave galley that the Earth is warming and will continue to warm rapidly through this century until we reach deadly temperatures around 2100.”

Investor’s Business Daily | September 23, 2009
Editorial title: Decades of Global Cooling Ahead?

Washington Examiner | August 4, 2009
Title: “Scientific evidence now points to global cooling, contrary to U.N. alarmism”
U.S. policymakers who cite “consensus” on man-made global warming as justification for anti-emission regulations are relying upon outdated and misleading material  from the United Nations that deliberately omits the influence of natural forces, according to climate skeptics. In fact, a growing body of evidence  now points to the emergence of another cooling cycle that could persist for decades.”

OneNewsNow | July 27, 2009
“Marc Morano with says all across America, record low temperatures have been broken throughout the summer. He blames that on a recent trend of global cooling that has been in place for more than seven years.”

Kennebec Journal | July 24, 2009
“Global warming ended three years ago. We are now entering a 27-year solar cycle of global cooling. … With scientific evidence being reported around the world, Congress, the news media, and the European Union are still proclaiming global warming, while, in fact, global cooling is now in effect.”

National Review | July 13, 2009
“Earth’s temperatures continue a chilling trend that began eleven years ago. As global cooling accelerates, global-warmists kick, scream, and push their pet theory — just like little kids who cover their ears and stomp their feet when older children tell them not to bother waiting up for Santa Claus on Christmas Eve.”

NewsBusters | June 15, 2009

So with all these reports about worldwide cold weather pouring in, why does Al Gore still have a shred of credibility left? When will he be questioned about how we can have Global Warming when all the evidence is now pointing towards Global Cooling? Come to think of it, when will Heidi Cullen, James Hansen, and Maggie Rodriguez of the CBS Early Show who fretted about an “ice-free” North Pole last year be called to account for being spectacularly wrong by the MSM?

Christian Broadcasting Network (700 Club) | April 20, 2009
Title: “Global Cooling Earth’s Little-Known Threat”
“many fear global warming is the greatest threat to mankind, but what if the Earth was no longer warming, and began to cool? … global cooling does not seem to be on anyone’s political agenda at the moment.”

Heartland Institute | March 2009
Title: “Global Cooling Continues”
“Continuing a decade-long trend of declining global temperatures, the year 2008 was significantly colder than 2007, and global temperatures for the year were below the average over the past 30 years.”

Business & Media Institute | January 15, 2009

Title: “The Ice Age Cometh: Experts Warn of Global Cooling”
“’Lou Dobbs Tonight’ segment dismisses manmade global warming theory – ‘effects of greenhouse gas have a small impact on climate change.’ If you’re fortunate enough to have it – don’t sell that oceanfront property for fear that the icecaps will melt, and rising seas swamping your property. A segment on CNN’s Jan. 13 “Lou Dobbs Tonight” explored the possibility that earth isn’t warming, but is, in fact, cooling.”

NewsMax | January 13, 2009
Title: “Global Cooling Headed Our Way”

Right Side News | January 7, 2009
Title: “Global Warming is Really Global Cooling”
“The truth: Since global temperatures have followed a cooling trend for eight straight years (or 11, if one goes back to the exceptionally warm el Nino year of 1998), most of the supposed recent consequences of “global warming” mentioned in the article - to the extent that the phenomena mentioned have occurred at all - cannot possibly have arisen because of “global warming”, because there has not been any.”

Centre for Research on Globalization | November 2, 2008
“Global Cooling is Here: Evidence for Predicting Global Cooling for the Next Three Decades,” by Prof. Don J. Easterbrook
“Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over. The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of the warming—it was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years. The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling, perhaps much deeper than the global cooling from about 1945 to 1977.”

Delta Farm Press | August 25, 2008

Title: “Global cooling gains momentum among scientists”

American Conservative Union Foundation | 2006
Title: “Global Cooling?” by Dennis Avery
“The official thermometers at the U.S. National Climate Data Center show a slight global cooling trend over the last seven years, from 1998 to 2005. … Fred Singer, a well-known skeptic on man-made warming, points out that the latest cooling trend is dictated primarily by a very warm El Nino year in 1998. “When you start your graph with 1998,” he says, “you will necessarily get a cooling trend.” | May 2008
Title: “Global Cooling-Wanna Bet?”
“Global cooling appears to be the “flavour of the month”. First, a rather misguided media discussion erupted on whether global warming had stopped, based on the observed temperatures of the past 8 years or so…”
[This one is from RealClimate, a site featuring actual scientists who know that global cooling is a farce, and decided to place a significant wager on the matter with some global cooling proponents. It is unclear whether the challenge was accepted.]

Canada Free Press | October 2009

Title: “Global Warming? The ‘Deniers’ are my Heroes”

“The most amazing aspect of the [global warming] hoax is that, despite a decade of global cooling, the mainstream media, print and electronic, relentlessly continue to write about ‘greenhouse gases’ as if they have anything to do with the Earth’s climate.”

WorldNetDaily | October 2009

Title: “Science bulletin:  ‘Sun heats Earth!’ - Russian research forecasts global cooling”

“Observations of the sun show that as for the increase in temperature, carbon dioxide is ‘not guilty,’ and as for what lies ahead in the coming decades, it is not catastrophic warming, but a global, and very prolonged temperature drop.”

The Telegraph | October 2009

Title: “Sceptics welcome BBC report on ‘global cooling’

“The pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling.”

New York Post | October 2009

Title: “The big chill”

“In 1998 the world reached its peak temperatures, according to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and ever since its been downhill. The world is going through a Global Cooling period.  There doesn’t appear to be any provable link between carbon emissions and global temperatures.”

The Globe and Mail | October 2009

Title: “Michael Ignatieff should think outside the green box”

Carbon dioxide has increased, temperatures have not: The models did not predict that incongruity.  We may indeed be in a period of cooling worldwide temperatures that could last another 10-20 years.”

Keremeos Review | October 2009

Title: “Forecast: A cooling tend on climate change”

“Average global temperature is rising at 1.40C per century, not the 3.90C indicated by the IPPC models. We are in the seventh year of global cooling. Sea levels, despite messages to the contrary, are rising at normal rates – eight inches per century – much less than the IPPC models suggested. There has been no significant rise in sea levels over the last four years.”

The New American | October 2009

Title: “More Americans Skeptical of Global Warming”

“The Earth has not warmed over the past 10 years, and some have reported slight global cooling over the same period.”

The American Spectator | October 2009

Title: “Cluck, It’s Cold Outside”

“That part [western Antarctica] has been warming for quite some time, but comprises barely 2 percent of the continent. The other 98 percent is cooling. Prof. Don Easterbrook of Western Washington University has done research showing that the most important ocean cycle, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), was in a warming cycle in the 1980s and ’90s, but that is now in a cool mode. He says this virtually assures us of three decades of global cooling.”

StandardNET | October 2009

Title: “There’s a global cooling trend”

“Satellite data from NASA shows no increase in global temperature since 1998. Mother Nature has provided two consecutive severe winters, and some scientists predict global cooling instead. Over 31,000 have signed a petition denying claims of global-warming alarmists.”

The New American | October 2009

Title: “Is the Golbal Warming Debate Over?”

“Global temperatures have steadily decreased over the past decade, despite rising levels of man-made carbon dioxide and climate models that predict the Earth will soon reach its boiling point.”

Yuma Sun | October 2009

Title: “Global warming refuted by facts”

“Climatologists have reported carbon dioxide has increased in the atmosphere, yet there has been a cooling trend over the past decade. They are now forecasting a continued cooling trend for at least the next two decades.  There is scientific data that correlates with our current global cooling trend.”

Hot Air Network | October 2009

Title: “Have You Stopped Beating Your Climate Science Yet?”

“[Certain] science suggests the real danger is not global warming but global cooling, even a new ice age? That would be far more catastrophic than warming… and if we really can affect the temperature, and we try to lower it when it’s already poised to plummet, we would be slitting our own throats out of sheer ignorance and hubris.”

FIS | October 2009

Title: “Climate change views increasingly divided”

“Recent studies have shown that the hottest year on record in recent history was in fact 1998 and that no increase in global temperature has been observed for the last 11 years, adding further scepticism to the climate debate.”

Daily Inter Lake | October 2009

Title: “Pulling back the curtain on global warming”

OK, here’s what we know. The warmest year recorded by our modern-day Noahs was in 1998, just about the time the global-warming fever was starting to peak. Since then, there has never been a year with global temperatures even close to reaching that level. So in practical terms, there has been a temperature decline since 1998, not an increase.  Moreover, some scientists predict that global cooling could continue for at least the next 20 years.”

The Wonk Room | July 14, 2009

Title: “Farm Bureau Chief Bob Stallman Believes In Global Cooling”

“The head of the largest farming lobbyist group believes that the earth is cooling. Bob Stallman, American Farm Bureau Federation, testified today before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that the science of man-made climate change isn’t ‘the whole story,’ citing several canards promoted by extremist global warming deniers. Stallman even claimed that climate models that have gotten so much attention did not predict the cooling that has occurred over the last decade.”

Washington Post | October 1, 2009

Title: “Cooling Down the Cassandras”

“By asserting that the absence of significant warming since 1998 is a mere “plateau,” not warming’s apogee, the [New York] Times assures readers who are alarmed about climate change that the paper knows the future and that warming will continue: Do not despair, bad news will resume.”

Wonk Room | September 14, 2009

Title: “O’Reilly’s Weatherman Joe Bastardi: ‘The Globe Is Actually Cooling’ ”

“I’m gonna show you the facts over the last two years. California has been very, very dry. Why is that the case? Well, whenever the Pacific Ocean starts cooling, and the global temperatures start to cool, California gets dry. You see this ocean temperature presentation, all this cold water off California means the air sinks over top of California. When it sinks, it dries out, so global cooling is actually a cause of drought in California, which by the way is a dry climate naturally.”

Wall Street Journal | October 30, 2009

Title: “The Earth Cools, and Fight Over Warming Heats Up”

“Two years ago, a United Nations scientific panel won the Nobel Peace Prize after concluding that global warming is “unequivocal” and is “very likely” caused by man.  Then came a development unforeseen by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC: Data suggested that Earth’s temperature was beginning to drop.”

WorldNetDaily | October 7, 2009

Title: “Climate czar has it down cold”

“Global temperatures in 2009 are continuing a decade-long decline, with June temperatures reaching levels not seen since the 1980s.  The evidence of a significant cooling at least since 2001 is so compelling, you no longer hear much about global warming.”

Baltimore Weather Examiner | October 27, 2009

Title: “Climate Change Debate Video: CO2 not to blame but sun may cause cooling”

“While CO2 may not have caused the warming of the last century, other forces like the sun might very well result in a dramatic cooling.  This could mimic the mini ice age from the 1600s and 1700s.”

The Star Ledger | October 7, 2009

Title: “Excellent critique of the report that began global-warming hysteria”

“We may be entering a period of global cooling no matter how much CO-2 we emit.”

Baltimore Weather Examiner | October 23, 2009

Title: “Arctic Sea Ice shows a recovery but NASA is not telling you”

” In this era of dire claims of climate marred by the controversy of global cooling, public dissent, and early season snow, a NASA follow up report appears to ignore the good news: The arctic sea ice is actually expanding!” | June 28, 2009

Title: “Why the global-warming movement may cool off”

“The problem for the global-warming crowd is simple: What if the planet begins to cool?  This is a distinct possibility due to the lack of sunspot activity at the moment.  A lack of sunspots has historically been accompanied by global cooling rather than warming. Ergo, we may face the threat of another ice age.”

There are also several websites dedicated specifically to promoting the global cooling theory.
“what if global warming is not what they say it is? What if the world’s temperature is headed in the opposite direction? Global temperatures increased for twenty years from the late 1970s to the late 1990s but have actually been cooling the last eleven years.”
“An alternative view, is that the Earth has been cooling since the 1930s when we had 3 of the 5 warmest years since 1860 in the US, and probably globally if the world environmental data base were cleaned up as is happening in the US. This site will be developed to show the science and the impacts related to global cooling, a very scary event compared to warming. It corresponds in the opposite way to the thousands of global warming sites.  An unbiased view is at our sister-site: Climate Change Facts. The Editor started his interest in climate change in the 1970s, charged with helping industry adapt to the certainty of global cooling. Tim Ball has documented the cooling trend and its implications.”
This site isn’t very interesting, although they got the money URL. It just aggregates all the skeptic articles on the subject.
“Have you noticed how cold the Winters have been getting?  Yeah, so have we.  If this keeps up we will all be froze!”

This is just a sampling, and since the AP story broke, the Google results increasingly return various links to the AP story or other coverage of the blind test. It would have been interesting to see the Google results a day before the story broke. But the examples above provide a snapshot of how widely this myth traveled before the AP popped the balloon. And sooner or later, no doubt, somebody will dust off this myth again.

Have you seen any other examples of skeptics promoting the global cooling theory? Let us know in the comments.

Get DeSmog News and Alerts


The Nashua Telegraph printed an article by Murdock, which is also found here:

It didnt have wide play. Telegraph Article didnt have the graph.

Here is Glenn Beck selling the Global Cooling myth in a circlejerk with Darth Monckton and John Bolton.

It seems to me that our man Fred has just made a big boo-boo:

“Fred Singer, a well-known skeptic on man-made warming, points out that the latest cooling trend is dictated primarily by a very warm El Nino year in 1998. “When you start your graph with 1998,” he says, “you will necessarily get a cooling trend.””

Kind of undermines his chums’ proclamations, doesn’t it?


Michaels says the same thing. These guys are all over the map and definitely not in agreement on this point. That’s what happens when your only proof is opinion, not actual research.

Isn’t the “global cooling” concept just an idea, expectation or prediction that we are entering a period of perhaps 30 years of cooling similar to the 30 year periods in the 20th century when warming was interrupted and we had some slight cooling?

So if thats how we define it, then we have to wait 20 -30 years to confirm or deny, no?

well - me

But when skeptics in general say global cooling, I doubt that they are usually talking about a permanent turn toward an ice age or something. I think generally they expect a temporary downturn and a return to gradual warming thats been going on for a long time.

I see that some denialists are talking about a 30 year cycle. Don’t know what the real scientists have to say about that.

The main denier theory circulating is that the earth has been cooling for the last few years:

“There has been no significant global warming since 1995, no warming since 1998, and global cooling for the past few years,” former U.S. Senate Environment Committee spokesman Marc Morano writes at

People find this plausible since the eastern/midwestern U.S. has been a major cool spot on the heating globe for the past few months. See for example NOAA“s report that September 2009 is the 2cd Warmest September for combined global air and ocean temperature.

Some deniers take a longer view and talk of coming cycles, even though it is clear that the recent heating overwhelms natural cycles (although the El Nino still produces “blips” on the chart. But the main emphasis is that we are already cooling down, a statement that is not true.

An article by Dr. David Evans, posted July 23/09 on a website called Statism Watch; “Global warming or global cooling a new trend in climate alarmism”

I see he has appeared at DeSmogBlog before.

Interesting website, that; they agree with Terry Corcoran’s concern with “green industrial statism”

Dont forget the late great Canwest news organization - including Lorne Gunter

Especially Lorne Gunter

Other pillars of Canadian journalism - Rex Murphy

The debate is alive and well with the Canadian oil patch engineers.

The loons - Tim Ball and the Friends of Science are busy on the Canada Free Press “because without America there is no free world” (eek - this is serious?)

My problem with the global warming theory is a thought I think a lot of other people have. The way I interpret the theory is that as Co2 rises, temperature will rise. This was happening, but I would say since the year 2000 until now, we have not seen temperature rises. (I’m just using this as a general timeline) And the earth either has to be warming or cooling. So Gingerlady I see the opposite of what you see, that is it seems that natural forces are drowning out the warming expected from Co2. My other problem with theory is that there has been more co2 in the atmosphere and the average temperature has been higher. I think a big part of your worries are that we will never stop putting co2 into the atmosphere but based on inevitability, we will have to find a new type of energy. But this is something that the market and technology will dictate. The fact remains, fossil fuels are the most economical choice right now.

We have seen temperature rises since 2000. The globe is warming less quickly, but it is still warming.

The change in temperature means changes in climate and this will affect the weather and probably cause crop failures. The longer we continue adding extra CO2 to the atmosphere, the worse the changes will get. That is why we need to conserve energy and find better sources of energy now.

It is not inconceivable that global cooling may also accompany global warming. It is best to stay with the more accurate term “global climate change”, since it is very erratic in its manifestations.

The situation of the earth’s overall ecosystem is not different than your experience of a fever. You experience hot flashes followed by sudden chills as your body attempts to preserve homeostasis. Death is the breakdown of that homeostasis. You’re bodily intelligence will attempt to mitigate any move towards an extremity of heat or cold by counter-actions in order to preserve the vital centre. When one system starts to fail (such as, say, respiratory) other systems (nervous, metabolic, circulatory) will react exaggeratedly to try and counter-balance the problem in the other system. These cooperate, you see. That’s what gives your body, normally, coherence and balanced functioning, as long as something isn’t interfering.

We are the interference today in the earth’s homeostatic functioning and, in that sense, are acting like a viral infection. The body is an image of the earth.

Likewise, global warming may heat up the ice-caps, these ice-caps lead to sudden oceanic cooling, bringing about sudden drops in temperature, at the same time, other systems try to compensate for this by heating up, so you get signs of global heating in some areas of the globe synchronously. This describes fever, which is still sickness.

Yes, we have seen temperature rises since 2000 but also temperature drops. If you look at Lindzen’s presentation entitled “Deconstructing Global Warming” he has a graph showing increased crop yields. Now, this does not mean the temperature is solely responsible for this increase but it is interesting to note.

Why is that “interesting to note”? A faster plant growth is worth nothing if that plant growth is mainly more cellulose. It means we, and other animals, need to eat more to get the same nutritional value.
It’s also worth nothing if faster plant growth goes along with the formation of more toxic compounds (as in poison ivy, for example). That means those plants get (even) more toxic.

A true skeptic would have noted this. If Lindzen did not, he is either dishonest, or ignorant.

Hey - some little Keromeos paper made the list. I’m surprised they even have a paper with editorial comment in that little fruit stand by the highway.

Anyways, I think the Keromeos Review can plead not guilty to promoting cooling theory. They seemed skeptical but reasonable.

“What is needed are some realistic minds focused on what is possible and the consequences of the possible actions for both the environment and the economy.”

Hear, Hear!